Kewenangan Notaris Dalam Melakukan Pengesahan Fotokopi Visum et Repertum Sesuai Dengan Aslinya
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In the case of the murder of Briptu Yosua, the results of observations from the forensic team were validated and made into an authentic deed that could be used as legal evidence. The act of validation (legalization) and making an authentic deed by a notary from the forensic results in the form of a Visum Et Repertum letter raises new problems, namely related to the notary's authority to legalize forensic results that have not been regulated in Notary Law. The purpose of this study is to find the notary's authority in legalizing forensic results and to find the basis for notaries to carry out legalization, as well as the notary's responsibility for the act of legalizing forensic results. This study uses a normative juridical approach. The results of this study are that the forensic results letter is an authentic letter so that the notary has the authority to legalize the forensic results letter and the basis for the notary to legalize the forensic results refers to the provisions of Article 15 paragraph (2) Notary Law, and the notary's responsibility for forensic results that have been validated is that the notary only ensures the forensic results letter of the person who signed the forensic results letter and ensures that the signature on the document is genuine, and the notary also checks that the forensic results letter issued is in accordance with legal procedures.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
A. Buku
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. 2016. Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana.
Hadjon, Philipus M. 2010. Teori Kewenangan: Suatu Kajian Teoritis. Jakarta: Kompas.
Soekanto, Soerjono. dan Sri Mamudji, 2017. Penemuan Bukti Dalam Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Prodjodikoro, R. Wirjono. 1983. Asas-Asas Hukum Perdata. Bandung: Sumur.
B. Artikel Jurnal
Ainun, Aulia Nur, and Arsyad Aldyan. “Kedudukan Visum Et Repertum Dalam Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Terhadap Perkara Penganiayaan Yang Mengakibatkan Kematian.” Verstek 11, no. 2 (2023): 241–51. https://doi.org/10.20961/JV.V11I2.71509.
Amalia, Rizky, Musakkir, and Syamsuddin Muchtar. “Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Terhadap Isi Akta Autentik Yang Tidak Sesuai Dengan Fakta.” Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 24, no. 1 (2021): 188–206. https://doi.org/10.56087/AIJIH.V24I1.77.
Angelia, Ister. “Kedudukan Hukum Notaris Merangkap Jabatan Sebagai Arbiter Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris.” Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan 5, no. 2 (2024): 164–76. https://doi.org/10.19184/jik.v5i2.52113.
Anggun, Narulita. “Kekuatan Pembuktian Dan Penilaian Alat Bukti Visum Et Repertum Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana.” Verstek 7, no. 1 (2019): 102–20. https://doi.org/10.20961/JV.V7I1.30072.
Ardiansyah, Erlan, Mohammad Saleh, and Rahmia Rachman. “Batasan Tanggungjawab Notaris Terhadap Akta Autentik Yang Dibuatnya.” Recital Review 4, no. 2 (2022): 432–51. https://doi.org/10.22437/RR.V4I2.18867.
Arisaputra, Muhammad Ilham. “Kewajiban Notaris Dalam Menjaga Kerahasiaan Akta Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Hak Ingkar Notaris.” Perspektif 17, no. 3 (2012): 173–83. https://doi.org/10.30742/PERSPEKTIF.V17I3.106.
Asufie, Khairunnisa Noor, and Ali Impron. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Notaris Dalam Pelaksanaan Jabatan Notaris Berdasarkan Teori Keseimbangan Berbasis Keadilan.” Journal of Law, Society, and Islamic Civilization 9, no. 2 (2021): 86–103. https://doi.org/10.20961/JOLSIC.V9I2.54803.
Dewi, Maya Puspita, Herowati Poesoko, and Aries Harianto. “Prinsip Pembacaan Akta Oleh Notaris Di Hadapan Penghadap Dan Saksi.” Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan 2, no. 1 (2021): 91–115. https://doi.org/10.19184/jik.v2i1.19349.
Dewi, Milinia Mutiara Yusshinta, and Bayu Indra Permana. “Keabsahan Akta Yang Dibuat Oleh Calon Notaris Yang Sedang Magang Di Kantor Notaris.” Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan 3, no. 2 (2022): 76–83. https://doi.org/10.19184/jik.v3i2.36437.
Dhammananda, Dwi Ratna Kamala Sari Lukman, and Ni Nyoman Ernita Ratnadewi. “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Visum Et Repertum Dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan: (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor: 221/Pid.B/2022/PN.Mtr.).” Metta : Jurnal Ilmu Multidisiplin 3, no. 2 (2023): 127–32. https://doi.org/10.37329/METTA.V3I2.2640.
Eskanugraha, Andika Putra. “Penandatanganan Akta Notariil Diluar Kantor Notaris Yang Masuk Dalam Lingkup Wilayah Jabatannya.” Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan 1, no. 2 (2020): 74–93. https://doi.org/10.19184/jik.v1i2.23721.
Gitayani, Luh Putu Cynthia. “Penerapan Etika Profesi Oleh Notaris Dalam Memberikan Pelayanan Jasa Kepada Klien.” Acta Comitas : Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan 3, no. 3 (2019): 426. https://doi.org/10.24843/ac.2018.v03.i03.p03.
Hadi, Misbah Imam Soleh, and Bayu Indra Permana. “Kontruksi Hukum Pembebasan Pajak Penghasilan Terhadap Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah Dalam Pembagian Hak Bersama Waris.” Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan 3, no. 1 (2022): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.19184/jik.v3i1.34912.
Haryono, Tri Agus, Rosidah Rosidah, Diki Permana, Bubun Bunyamin, Pipit Yuliarpan, and Hernawati Hernawati. “The Role of the Visum Et Repertum in the Investigation Process of Crime of Maltreatment.” Formosa Journal of Applied Sciences 4, no. 1 (2025): 289–96. https://doi.org/10.55927/FJAS.V4I1.13298.
Jaya, Jamie Armadi, Mulyani Zulaeha, and Suprapto Suprapto. “Kewenangan Notaris Dalam Mensertifikasi Transaksi Elektronik Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang No. 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Jabatan Notaris.” Notary Law Journal 1, no. 2 (2022): 131–44. https://doi.org/10.32801/NOLAJ.V1I2.19.
Mumtazh, Dilla Naharul. “Reforming of Related Instruments for Indonesia ’ s Cyber Notary Concept Implementation” 6, no. 1 (2025): 43–55. https://doi.org/10.19184/JIK.v6i1.51538.
Paramita, Nawang Putri, and R B Sularto. “Visum Et Repertum As Evidence In Uncovering The Occurrence of Criminal Acts.” Devotion : Journal of Research and Community Service 4, no. 2 (2023): 596–600. https://doi.org/10.36418/DEVOTION.V4I2.411.
Permana, Bayu Indra, Mohammad Rafi Al Farizy, and Ferdiansyah Putra Manggala. “Responsibility of Notary for Registered Private Deed in the Perspective of Law of Evidence.” Jurnal Justiciabelen 7, no. 1 (2024): 66–75. https://doi.org/10.30587/justibelen.v7i1.7801.
Prakoso, Bhim, and Bayu Indra Permana. “Kepastian Hukum Surat Kuasa Membebankan Hak Tanggungan Yang Dibuat Notaris.” Notaire 8, no. 3 (2025): 347–72. https://doi.org/10.20473/NTR.V8I3.78673.
Prakoso, Bhim, Bayu Indra Permana, and Mohammad Rafi Al Farizy. “Penyuluhan Hukum Yang Dilakukan Notaris Kepada Para Pihak Dalam Perspektif Kepastian Hukum.” Acta Comitas : Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan 9, no. 4 (2024): 453–64. https://doi.org/10.24843/ac.2018.v09.i04.p01.
Puspitasari, Mayang, and Budi Pramono. “Legal Consequences Of Doctor’s Negligence in Making Visum et Repertum and Corpse Autopsis.” Formosa Journal of Applied Sciences 2, no. 3 (2023): 387–96. https://doi.org/10.55927/FJAS.V2I3.3367.
Sae, Abelia Lovena, and Dewati Candraningtyastuti. “Pemaknaan Klausula Menghadap Dalam Pelaksanaan Verlidjen Akta Notaril Melalui Media TeleKonfrensi Di Era Digitalisasi.” Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan 5, no. 2 (2024): 150–63. https://doi.org/10.19184/jik.v5i2.47352.
Sahali, Gustilawati, Fenty U Puluhulawa, and Avelia Rahmah Mantali. “Visum ET Repertum Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana.” Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora Dan Seni 1, no. 4 (2023): 342–48. https://doi.org/10.62379/JISHS.V1I4.773.
Setiawan, Khafid, Bhim Prakoso, and Moh. Ali. “Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta Kontrak Yang Berlandaskan Prinsip Kehati-Hatian.” Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan 2, no. 2 (2021): 43–52. https://doi.org/10.19184/jik.v2i2.20919.
Setyawan, Vincentius Patria. “The Importance of Visum Et Repertum in the Crime of Serious Theft.” ARIMA : Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora 1, no. 2 (2023): 58–63. https://jurnalistiqomah.org/index.php/arima/article/view/159.
Sihombing, Imanuel, and Fitria Ramadhani Siregar. “Kedudukan Visum Et Repertum Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan.” Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research 3, no. 4 (2023): 9366–9403. https://j-innovative.org/index.php/Innovative/article/view/4712.
Simanjuntak, Tuti Gusmawati, Lili Rahmayana Harahap, and Ahmad Mulia Sembiring. “The Role of Visum Et Repertum in Proving Criminal Matters in Indonesia.” International Journal of Law, Social Science, and Humanities 1, no. 2 (2024): 83–90. https://doi.org/10.70193/IJLSH.V1I2.164.
Simarmata, Anggi Novaldi, and Oci Sanjaya. “Visum Et Repertum Dalam Pembuktian Perkara Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Berat (Kajian Putusan No. 434/Pid.B/2018/PNSim).” Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai 7, no. 1 (2023): 104–14. https://doi.org/10.31004/JPTAM.V7I1.5269.
Sirait, Gladys Natalie Aurielle, and Benny Djaja. “Liability of Notarial Deeds as Authentic Deeds in Accordance with the Notary Office Law.” UNES Law Review 5, no. 4 (2023): 3363–78. https://doi.org/10.31933/UNESREV.V5I4.641.
Subari, Misbah Imam, and Justicia Firdaus Kurniawan. “Penggunaan Klausula Proteksi Diri Bagi Notaris Dalam Akta Partij Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris.” Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan 4, no. 2 (2023): 144–60. https://doi.org/10.19184/jik.v4i2.44196.
Sulthoni, Ahmad Farich. “Batas Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Atas Pembuatan Akta Otentik.” Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan 2, no. 1 (2021): 69–90. https://doi.org/10.19184/jik.v2i1.20961.
Sumino, Renny, Adriano, and Budi Pramono. “Medicolegal Aspects of Visum Et Repertum in Sexual Violence Criminal Cases.” JILPR: Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review 5, no. 1 (2023): 88–98. https://doi.org/10.56371/JIRPL.V5I1.166.
Tifanny, Anna. “Sanksi Terhadap Notaris Yang Melakukan Promosi Dan Publikasi Pada Media Tiktok.” UNES Law Review 5, no. 2 (2022): 394–401. https://doi.org/10.31933/UNESREV.V5I2.315.
Wardana, Dendik Surya, Iswi Hariyani, and Dodik Prihatin AN. “Pertanggung Jawaban Notaris Terhadap Keabsahan Akta Outentik Yang Dilakukan Secara Electronic Dalam Pembuktian Di Pengadilan.” Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan 2, no. 2 (2021): 14–26. https://doi.org/10.19184/jik.v2i2.24088.
Wardhani, Restri Ismi, and Rhama Wisnu Wardhana. “Tanggung Jawab Notaris Terhadap Kekuatan Pembuktian Akta Dibawah Tangan Yang Telah Di Waarmerking.” Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan 1, no. 2 (2020): 19–33. https://doi.org/10.19184/jik.v1i2.23431.
Wulandari, Indah, and Arsyad Aldyan. “Pembuktian Visum Et Repertum Pada Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Yang Mengakibatkan Kematian.” Verstek 11, no. 2 (2023): 189–97. https://doi.org/10.20961/JV.V11I2.71602.
Yustica, Anugrah, Ngadino, and Novira Maharani Sukma. “Peran Etika Profesi Notaris Sebagai Upaya Penegakan Hukum.” Notarius 13, no. 1 (2019): 60–71. https://doi.org/10.14710/NTS.V13I1.29162.
Zahro, Vikriatuz, Iswi Hariyani, and Iwan Rachmad Soetijono. “Juridical Implications of the Issuance of Covernotes by A Notary as Basis of Disbursing Credit of Banking.” Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan 4, no. 2 (2023): 102–18. https://doi.org/10.19184/jik.v4i2.43761.
C. Artikel Website
https://www.republika.co.id/berita/rfzo4d485/hasil-autopsi-pembanding-brigadir-j-diserahkan-ke-bareskrim-begini-kondisinya-part1. Diakses pada tanggal 13/02/2023 pukul 13.22 WIB.
D. Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Perdata
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana
Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang perubahan dari Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana
Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2025 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana