Perlindungan Konsumen Atas Kerugian Akibat Ulasan Menyesatkan Pada Produk Barang Di E-Commerce
Main Article Content
Abstract
Over time, problems have arisen for consumers when shopping online. One of these problems is the prevalence of misleading reviews attached to products offered by businesses on E-Commerce platforms. The widespread use of misleading reviews is certainly very detrimental to consumers who want to shop online, as consumers will not obtain accurate information that corresponds to the benefits of the products they intend to buy. The legal research method used in this study is the normative juridical research method with the use of statutory and conceptual approaches. This study has two main discussions, namely the forms of consumer protection and the legal efforts that consumers can take against losses resulting from misleading reviews spread on E-Commerce platforms. In accordance with the main issues discussed, this study analyzes and examines how legal protection is obtained by consumers, both internally sourced from agreements and externally sourced from applicable laws and regulations, as well as how dispute resolution efforts can be pursued by consumers through both litigation and non-litigation methods.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
A. Buku
Soerjono dan Abdurrahman. 2003. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki. 2016. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.
Ahmadi Miru. 2013. Prinsip-Prinsip Perlindungan Hukum Bagi konsumen Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Firman Tumantara Endipradja. 2016. Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Malang: Setara Press.
Moch. Isnaeni. 2016. Pengantar Hukum Kebendaan. Surabaya: Revka Petra Media.
Abdulkadir Muhammad. 2010. Hukum Perjanjian. Bandung: Alumni.
Aman Sinaga. 2001. Pemberdayaan Hak-Hak Konsumen di Indonesia. Jakarta:Direktorat Perlindungan Konsumen DITJEN Perdagangan dalam Negeri Departemen Perindustrian dan Perdagangan Bekerjasama dengan Yayasan Gemainti.
Khotibul Umam. 2010. Penyelesaian Sengketa di Luar Pengadilan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Yustisia.
Susanti Adi Nugroho. 2019. Manfaat Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Jakarta: Kencana.
Nurnaningsih Amriani. 2012. Mediasi Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata di Pengadilan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
B. Artikel Jurnal
Yanci Libria Fista, Aris Machmud, Suartini, “Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen Dalam Transaksi E-commerceDitinjau dari Perspektif Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen”, Binamulia Hukum 12, No 1, (2023): 177-189. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v12i1.599
Dohse, K.A, “Fabricating Feedback: Blurring The Line Between Brand Management and Bogus Reviews”, Journal of Law, Technology & Policy 2, No. 1, (2013):45.
Zaky Fahma Auliya, Moh Rifqi Khairul Umam, Septi Kurnia Prastiwi, “Online Customer Reviews dan Rating: Kekuatan Baru Pada Pemasaran Online di Indonesia”, EBBANK, Vol 8 No.1 (2017):88-98. https://www.ebbank.stiebbank.ac.id/index.php/EBBANK/article/view/112/100
Adelia Budiman , Iwan, “Upaya Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pelaku Usaha yang Dirugikan Akibat Adanya Ulasan Negatif Fiktif Ditinjau dari Fatwa DSN MUI No 24 Tahun 2017 (Studi Kasus Pada Aplikasi Google Maps)”, Unes Law Review 6, No. 2 (2023): 5263-5273. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1353
Dohse, “Fabricating Feedback: Blurring The Line Between Brand Management and Bogus Reviews”, Journal of Law, Technology & Policy, Vol 3, (2013): 365.
Mansyur, A., & Rahman, I, “Penegakan Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Sebagai Upaya Peningkatan Mutu Produksi Nasional”, Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang 2, No. 1, (2015): 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.26532/jph.v2i1.1411
Indriana, “Pertanggung Jawaban Pelaku Usaha Dan Konsumen Terhadap Sistem Pembayaran Cash On Delivery (COD)”, Jurnal Legal Reasoning 4, No.2, (2022): 168-183 https://doi.org/10.35814/jlr.v4i2.3604
Rafni Suryaningsih Harun, Weny A. Dungga, Abdul Hamid Tome, “Implementasi Asas Itikad Baik Dalam Perjanjian Transaksi Jual Beli Online” , Jurnal Legalitas 12, No.2, (2019): 94-103 https://doi.org/10.33756/jelta.v12i2.5796
Made Isma Amanda Swadesi, I Nyoman Putu Budhiarta dan Ni Made Puspautari Ujianti, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Terkait Label Berbahasa Asing Dalam Suatu Produk Kosmetik”, Jurnal Analogi Hukum 3, No. 3, (2021): 344-349 https://doi.org/10.22225/ah.3.3.2021.344-349
Ariani, P., & Rahmawati, I, “Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen di Era Digital: Perbandingan Mediasi Online dan Mediasi Offline”, Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis 17, No 2, (2022): 231-243.
Monica Jeannete Tampinongkol,Vecky Y. Gosal, Anna S. Wahongan, “Aspek Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Berdasarkan Pasal 45 Ayat 2 Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen”, Lex Privatum, Vol. 9 No. 5, (2021): 240-248. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/33852
Triara Rizki Utami, Gilang Apriliandi, Fariz Madhani Akbar, Heri Wandono, Iska Wina Destia, “Eksekusi Putusan dan Implikasi Hukum Bagi Pihak yang Tidak Patuh dalam Perkara Perdata”, Jurnal Serambi Hukum 16, No 1, (2023): 144-151. https://doi.org/10.59582/sh.v16i01.924
C. Artikel Website
Mccluskey, M. (2022). Inside the War on Fake Consumer Reviews, TIME. Fake Reviews: Inside the Fight to Stop Them | TIME
Shoope Indonesia. Kebijakan Anti-Brushing Kebijakan Anti-Brushing | Pusat Edukasi Penjual Shopee Indonesia
D. Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi Dan Trasaksi Elektronik